Cases 41 - 50 of 144
Kalawa et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv01969
Defendant:
U.S. General Service Administration, ABC CORP. 1-10, John/Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Amara Kalawa and Alfreda Bangura
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
EMUWA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2020cv01756
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff:
AMARA EMUWA, MICHAUX LUKUSA, LOUISE TRAUMA CENTER LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
New England Banana Company, Inc. v. Amara Market LC et al
as 1:2020cv11229
Plaintiff:
New England Banana Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Amara Market LC, Sophia Soeurn and Sothea Khiev
Trustee:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Dwayne Rieco v. McCreary, et al
as 20-1462
Defendant / Appellee:
GARCIA, INMATE MCCREARY, ISIAH HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
AMARA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv01080
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH AMARA
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amara v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
as 8:2019cv03125
Defendant:
Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Philip Amara
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Caylor et al v. Ashtabula County
as 1:2019cv02628
Defendant:
Ashtabula County
Plaintiff:
Wendy Caruso, Amara Kantola, Tracey Caylor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RIECO v. MCCREARY et al
as 2:2019cv01136
Defendant:
RUSSELL WOODS, HAYNES, MCCREARY and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
