Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Zamora v. Archie et al
as 3:2026cv00192
Plaintiff: Laura Zamora
Defendant: Carla Archie and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Collier
as 3:2026cv00800
Petitioner: Archie Lee Smith
Respondent: Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hector v. Frank J. Bisignano
as 4:2026cv00340
Plaintiff: Archie Hector
Defendant: Frank J. Bisignano
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Spencer v. Hasson et al
as 2:2026cv00014
Plaintiff: Tristan Spencer
Defendant: Matthew Hasson, Archie Quintana and Sheriff Johnny Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAPMAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv02262
Plaintiff: SUSAN CHAPMAN and ARCHIE CHAPMAN
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Unknown: JOHNSON AND JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bridges v. Warden of FCI Schuylkill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00528
Petitioner: Archie Bridges
Respondent: Warden of FCI Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Laury v. Hanson et al
as 1:2026cv10571
Plaintiff: Darren Laury
Defendant: Karen Hanson, Venson Carter, Krigg Sipple and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00173
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Archie Taylor v. USA
as 26-1273
Petitioner: ARCHIE J. TAYLOR
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv20695
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?