Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Taylor v. Alexis
as 24-3350
Defendant:
NYDOCS Commissioner CYNTHIA BRANN, RNDC Co. JENKINGS, MDC WHO WORK THERE IN LEGAL DIV DEPT VISITS and others
Plaintiff:
ROY TAYLOR
Batchelor et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Sandy Batchelor and Cornlieus Jackson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, John Doe Persons A-M and John Doe Entities N-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BATCHELOR v. CO1 JENNER et al
as 2:2024cv06136
Plaintiff:
STEFAN BATCHELOR
Defendant:
LT. JUDGE and CO1 JENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv02726
Defendant:
Garrett Strode, Eric Dunston, City of Aurora Police Department, The and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BATCHELOR v. SIMMONDS
as 2:2024cv04981
Defendant:
J SIMMONDS
Plaintiff:
STEFAN BATCHELOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHROEDER v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, JEREMY HAMILTON, DAWN JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Caleb Batchelor
as 24-6795
Defendant:
CALEB MALIK BATCHELOR
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BATCHELOR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv08330
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE BATCHELOR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BATCHELOR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv08330
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE BATCHELOR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
