Cases 41 - 50 of 74
LEWIS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv07528
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH , MR. ORTIZ , JAMES E. SHADID and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brian Paul v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41412
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN PAUL
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Brian Paul v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-40374
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN PAUL
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
HOWELL et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARIE ELIZABETH ANNE HOWELL, BRIAN PAUL HOWELL, JANE DOE(S) and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
Radtke v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02729
Plaintiff:
Brian Paul Radtke
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00166
Petitioner:
Brian Paul
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Radtke v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Brian Paul Radtke
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brian Engel v. Harold Clarke
as 14-7264
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN PAUL ENGEL
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE
Brian Engel v. Harold Clarke
as 14-6952
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN PAUL ENGEL
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
