Cases 41 - 50 of 5,776
Bond v. AM PM Health Solutions LLC
as 8:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bond
Defendant:
AM PM Health Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clark v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
John R. Clark
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, City of Charlotte and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Todd Bonds v. Berne Union Local Schools, et al
as 24-3283
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Defendant:
DANIEL SNIVLEY, Athletic Director, Individually, LEAH ARMSTRONG, Case Worker, Individually and BERNE UNION LOCAL SCHOOLS
Merchants Bonding Company v. Holden
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Company
Defendant:
Michael Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Bonds v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02205
Petitioner:
Brandon Bonds
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bonds v. Woodall et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Stacey Alicia Bonds
Defendant:
Sonya Woodall, Mike Milholen and The City of Magnolia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bond, et al v. Sheriff of Ottawa County
as 24-5035
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN P. BOND, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terral Ellis, II, deceased, TERRAL B. ELLIS, SR. and SHELLY BLISS
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF OTTAWA COUNTY, in his official capacity, OFFICER JOHNNY BRAY and OFFICER CHARLES SHOEMAKER
Edward Wright v. Donnie Raynor
as 24-6286
Plaintiff:
EDWARD A. WRIGHT
Defendant:
DONNIE R. RAYNOR, CHRISTINE E. MANGUM and MONICA BOND
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
ORTIZ v. PINCKNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ
Defendant:
SHATEEMA PINCKNEY, TAMEKA SMITH, REGINA HAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
