Cases 41 - 50 of 5,307
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Pratt v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
District Judge Jack Barker, Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant:
JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
Stevenson v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
Charlie Stevenson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant:
C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. LIMA CHARLIE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 3:2024cv05423
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
LIMA CHARLIE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Wrighten v. Old Linco LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Lisa R. Wrighten
Defendant:
Old Linco LLC and Charlie R. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
