Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Herron v. 3M
as 1:2005cv00360
Defendant:
3M, Congoleum Corporation, D.B. Riley, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Herron, Carl Abbott, Larry Donnell Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Thigpen v. Gonzalez
as 2:2011cv01241
Petitioner:
Clyde William Thigpen
Respondent:
Terri L. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2009cv14380
Plaintiff:
Melvin Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. Clyde William
as 09-50251
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLYDE WILLIAMS
Williams v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv02866
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, Sheldon Harris and William Maddux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Herron v. 3M
as 1:2005cv00175
Defendant:
3M, Congoleum Corporation, D.B. Riley, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Herron, Carl Abbott, Larry Donnell Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Harlow v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv06147
Plaintiff:
Clyde William Harlow, Clyde William Harlow, Clyde William Harlow and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Williams v. Hampden County Correctional Center
as 3:2008cv30224
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Hampden County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hirschfield et al v. San Diego Unified Port District et al
as 3:2008cv02103
Plaintiff:
Alan Hirschfield, Nicole Hirschfield, Alan Hirschfield and others
Defendant:
San Diego Unified Port District, Clyde Williams and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
