Cases 41 - 50 of 163
Partners In Travel, Inc. v. Charynn R. Marshall et al
as 1:2019cv00435
Defendant:
Charynn R. Marshall and Larry D. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Partners In Travel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Marshall v. Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine
as 1:2018cv00631
Defendant:
Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv03586
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Marshall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
CONTE et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CONTE and PAMELA D. MARSHALL
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marvin Harris, et al v. Charles Marshall, et al
as 17-17372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN HARRIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES D. MARSHALL, Warden, T. J. STEELE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director Department of Corrections and others
Marshall et al v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as LAE/2:17-cv-08710
Plaintiff:
Darlene H. Marshall and Jerome D. Marshall
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Earl Cooper v. L. Doyle, et al
as 17-40998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL DANIEL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DOYLE, Warden, SAMUEL A. OJO, Correctional Officer, SHAYLA B. HEBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Synovus Securities, Inc. v. Tatum et al
as 1:2017cv03759
Petitioner:
Synovus Securities, Inc.
Respondent:
Douglas Tatum, Daniel D. Barks and Harriette D. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Marshall et al v. Hospira Worldwide, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08710
Plaintiff:
Darlene H. Marshall and Jerome D. Marshall
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc. and Hospira Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01699
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , C. EPHRUSSI , AMY MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
