Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Lozano v. Weaver et al
as 1:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Leonardo M Lozano
Defendant:
Virgil D Weaver, Elzis Duncan, Scott W Billeaud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Sparks
as 4:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Weaver, Jr
Defendant:
Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WILLIAMS et al v. WEAVER et al
as 2:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
SAM WILLIAMS and JOHN F. MCCOY, III
Defendant:
RANDALL D. WEAVER and BIG G EXPRESS, INC.
Cross_claimant:
BIG G EXPRESS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
SAM WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Weaver v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv03216
Petitioner:
Justin D Weaver
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Weaver v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2012cv00585
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Edgar D. Weaver
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Saunders et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2011cv01076
Plaintiff:
Robert Donnell, John A. Saunders, Mark W. Saunders and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Saunders et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
John A. Saunders , Mark W Saunders , Edgar D Weaver and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jefferson v. Weaver et al
as 1:2011cv00382
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jefferson
Defendant:
D Weaver, FNU Ritchie, John Does/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
