Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Phillips et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2013cv11370
Plaintiff:
Catherine Phillips , Joseph Valenti , Michigan AFSCME Council 25 and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D SNYDER and Andrew Dillon
Trottman v. Budz et al
as 2:2012cv00617
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Trottman
Defendant:
Timothy Budz, Donald Watkins, Jacques Lamour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bardney v. Watkin
as 1:2012cv00184
Petitioner:
Leon Bardney
Respondent:
Donald Watkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATKINS v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv06281
Plaintiff:
DONALD WATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, BELIND, CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE and VENITA, SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2010cv01945
Petitioner:
DONALD WATKINS
Respondent:
MUNICIPAL COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Moore et al
as 9:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
Antoine Donald Watkins
Defendant:
C.O. Moore, C.O. Labarge, Hewett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. C.O. Moore et al
as 1:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
Antoine Donald Watkins
Defendant:
C.O. Moore, C.O. Labarge, C.O. Hewett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charest v. Zenith Administrators, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv03415
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charest
Defendant:
Zenith Administrators, Inc., Jeffrey Seipel, Jeffrey Seipel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type:
Other Statutes
WATKINS v. FAMILY COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2009cv02860
Plaintiff:
DONALD WATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
FAMILY COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Donald Watkins, Jr. v. Elica Blocker, et al, et al
as 08-3784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD WATKINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET THERESA MURPHY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS COURT and ELICA BLOCKER, COURT EMPLOYEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
