Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Morgan v. Tomlinson, et al
as 14-7004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LAMONT MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY L. TOMLINSON, Mayor of Durant, Oklahoma, BRIAN CHAVEZ, Detective, BROCK JONES, Sgt. and others
Defendant:
BRYAN COUNTY, Durant, Oklahoma, MANDA WELLS and JOHN HICKS
J & J Sports Productions Inc. v. The In Spot Dessert Bar and Lounge, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01450
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc.
Defendant:
The In Spot Dessert Bar and Lounge, Inc. and David Lamont Holman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Morgan v. Wilson
as 4:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Morgan
Defendant:
Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morgan v. Wilson
as 3:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Morgan
Defendant:
Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bell v. Abraham et al
as 3:2012cv04033
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Bell
Defendant:
SRT. Abraham and NFN NLN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morgan v. Tomlinson et al
as 6:2012cv00379
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Morgan
Defendant:
Jerry L. Tomlinson, Bryan County, Brian Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. David Beek
as 12-7457
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LAMONT BEEKS
Lamont v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00695
Petitioner:
David Lamont
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAMONT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2011cv00274
Petitioner:
DAVID LAMONT
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Mendenhall et al
as 5:2010cv03246
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Young, II
Defendant:
Danetta F. Mendenhall and Michael J. Bartee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
