Cases 41 - 50 of 1,853
Floorcoverings International, Ltd. v. MacMelville
as 1:2023cv04860
Plaintiff:
Floorcoverings International, Ltd.
Defendant:
David S. MacMelville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vasquez v. New Mexico Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-2164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT VENCENT VASQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALISHA TAFOYA-LUCERO, In her individual and official capacity, THE WARDEN OF THE PENITENTIARY OF NEW MEXICO and others
Heimlich v. United States et al
as 4:2023cv03951
Plaintiff:
Edmund Heimlich
Defendant:
United States, State Of Texas, Michael Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Doherty
as 1:2023cv15025
Plaintiff:
Larone Williams
Defendant:
Chicago, Gregory J. Doherty, Johnathan M. David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Sorrells
as 23-40571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. Sorrells, David S. Vidalier and Dynette B. Johnson, LVN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 2:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, OFFICER JOHN DOE, DESK SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORSYTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03945
Plaintiff:
DAVID S FORSYTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. David Lindsey
as 23-2770
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID S. LINDSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
