Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Horton v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Dionna Nadine Horton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01155
Plaintiff:
Stanley L Scott and Dionna C Scott
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Dionna Horton
as 16-50939
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DIONNA NADINE HORTON
Stephen Allen et al v. Experian Holdings, Inc., et al
as CAC/8:15-cv-01803
Plaintiff:
Stephen Allen , Dionna Blackson , David Brown and others
Defendant:
Experian Holdings Inc. and Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Stephen Allen et al v. Experian Holdings, Inc., et al
as 8:2015cv01803
Plaintiff:
Stephen Allen, Dionna Blackson, David Brown and others
Defendant:
Experian Holdings Inc. and Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Horton v. United States Of America
as 7:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Dionna Nadine Horton
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pritchard v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
Dionna Pritchard
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wurth v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Dionna Wurth
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06726
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. John Doe 1, P.O. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Dionna King and Mayzabeth Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
