Cases 41 - 50 of 193
JOHNSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv19422
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE EARL JOHNSON, JR.
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Baetz et al
as 2:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
James Earl Johnson
Defendant:
A. Baetz, Nancy Brenizer and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Johnson, Jr v. Rigling et al
as 2:2019cv01639
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
V Melendez, N Smith, C Rigling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Flanagan et al
as 1:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Rita Jean Johnson, Rita Jean Howard, Randy Earl Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02615
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Earl Johnson and Sherry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. O'Neill et al
as 3:2019cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
William Cohen, Dan Hamm, Sean O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mesa et al
as 5:2019cv00164
Defendant:
Dr. Virginia Mesa, Dr. W. Noel, Michelle Schouest and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2019cv00224
Petitioner:
William Earl Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donald Johnson v. Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital
as 19-5219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD EARL JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SAINT THOMAS MIDTOWN HOSPITAL
Johnson v. St. Thomas Hospital, Mid-Town
as 3:2019cv00096
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Johnson
Defendant:
St. Thomas Hospital, Mid-Town
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
