Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morris v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Phillip G. Morris
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Ruth v. City of Creedmoor
as 15-1745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RUTH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CREEDMOOR, ROBERT G. MORRIS, in his official and individual capacities and JOHN DOES, in their official and individual capacities
Morris v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06039
Plaintiff:
Willie G. Morris
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Afrocentric Bayith Yahweh Yahdraim African Hebrews ABYYAH et al v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Afrocentric Bayith Yahweh Yahdraim African Hebrews ABYYAH, Douglas Marshall, Jammora Sims and others
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Alex Taylor, A. Al-Khatib and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempstead v. Clark et al
as 3:2015cv00374
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Roland Clark, Cesar, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempstead v. Colon et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Colon, John Doe One, McGrutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Morris et al
as 3:2014cv01157
Plaintiff:
Deangelo M Jones
Defendant:
David G Morris, Lt Best and Alex Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02028
Plaintiff:
Michael G Morris
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
