Cases 41 - 50 of 11,741
Graham v. Leisure Pools USA Trading
as 24-50347
Plaintiff:
Timothy Graham
Defendant:
Leisure Pools USA Trading, Incorporated, doing business as Explore Industries Services USA 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GRAHAM v. MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
BETTY GRAHAM
Defendant:
MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER and BRAD FRIEDEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldrop v. Graham Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Avin Waldrop
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY GRAHAM
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, ENOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. doing business as Techno Torch, BIC USA Inc. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Kevino GrahamIn re: Kevino Graham
as 24-1756
Petitioner:
In re: KEVINO GRAHAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
