Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Advanced Technology Building Solutions, LLC et al v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Advanced Technology Building Solutions, LLC and Donald Hewitt
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi , Harvey Johnson , Jr. , Jackson Redevelopment Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Anthony Grissom Sr v. Redflex Traffic Systems Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01985
Plaintiff:
Anthony Grissom, Sr
Defendant:
Harvey Johnson, Redflex Traffic Systems Inc and Dale Sigler
Anthony C Grissom v. Redflex Traffic Systems Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01476
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Grissom, Sr
Defendant:
Harvey Johnson, Redflex Traffic Systems Inc and Dale Sigler
Jennifer Peavey v. University of Louisville, et al
as 11-6016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER PEAVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE, BRENT WRIGHT, JOHN ROBERTS and others
Stringer v. Peters et al
as 4:2011cv01085
Plaintiff:
Charles L Stringer
Defendant:
Ed Peters, Bobby Delaughter, Charles Knauss and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Stringer v. Peters
as 4:2011mc00125
Plaintiff:
Charles L Stringer
Defendant:
Ed Peters, Bobby Delaughter, Charles Knauss and others
Bissell v. Regan et al
as 2:2011cv02163
Plaintiff:
Brian Bissell
Defendant:
J. Martin Regan, Thomason, Hendrix, Harvey, Johnson & Mitchell, PLLC and Crichton College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Driggett et al
as 2:2009cv14127
Plaintiff:
Harvey Johnson
Defendant:
Jeremy Driggett and Burton, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Fennell v. Allen et al
as 3:2009cv00468
Plaintiff:
Wesley Fennell, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Allen, David Zook and Harvey Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peavey v. University of Louisville et al
as 3:2009cv00484
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Peavey
Defendant:
University of Louisville, Brent Wright, John Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
