Cases 41 - 50 of 100
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv02398
Plaintiff:
ROGER INGRAM
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Ingram v. Heatherington et al
as 1:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
David Freeman Ingram
Defendant:
Officer Justin Heatherington and Town of Nutter Fort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Brandon Ingram
as 26-6435
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRANDON LASHON INGRAM, a/k/a Brandon Lashun Ingram, a/k/a Little B, a/k/a B
Vela v. Ingram et al
as 1:2026cv02791
Plaintiff:
Pastor Isabel Vela
Defendant:
Ingram, Hoffman and City of Fresno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michael Clark v. Behrens et al
as 1:2026cv11627
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
M. Kathleen Behrens, Richard J. Barry, Kathryn Boor and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ingram v. Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete, LLC
as 4:2026cv01445
Plaintiff:
Bruce Allen Ingram
Defendant:
Smyrna Ready Mix Concrete, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ingram v. Pinder Security Systems et al
as 1:2026cv02712
Defendant:
Pinder Security Systems, Pinder Elite Security, W.S.C. of N.Y., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
INGRAM v. PRAUL et al.
as 2:2026cv03486
Plaintiff:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Defendant:
JOHN PRAUL, VICTOR HORNE, C. FREDERICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
England et al v. Ingram Barge Company LLC
as 3:2026cv00343
Plaintiff:
Kevin England and Jerry Vicknair, Jr.
Defendant:
Ingram Barge Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03440
Plaintiff:
ROGER INGRAM
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
