Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Ingram v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
Grady Ingram
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas Bell, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jon Baumgardner v. David Ebbert
as 13-2107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON BAUMGARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EBBERT, RILEY, R. LAINO and others
Westover v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00699
Plaintiff:
Raymond M Westover
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Thomas Bell, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Ball
as 4:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Johnson
Defendant:
George J. Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Deibler v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00539
Plaintiff:
Gordon Wesley Deibler, III
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources LLC, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2012cv01111
Plaintiff:
Sean Williams
Defendant:
John Rodrigues, Love, Spillmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS et al v. J. BALL & SONS, INC.
as 2:2012cv02065
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
J. BALL & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Oller v. Roussel et al
as 6:2011cv02207
Plaintiff:
John W Oller
Defendant:
Nancye C Roussel, A David Barry and Martin J Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00985
Plaintiff:
Ashley J. Ball
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BALL v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv46654
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. BALL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
