Cases 41 - 50 of 646
Jones v. State of Ne DHHS BMH Lancaster County
as 8:2022cv00342
Petitioner:
James E. Jones
Respondent:
State of Ne DHHS BMH Lancaster County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16903
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL JONES and JAMES JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. State of Nebraska DHHS et al
as 4:2022cv03172
Plaintiff:
James E. Jones
Defendant:
State of Nebraska DHHS, Christopher D. Seifert, Dr. Rajeev Chattarveti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. City of Boulder, Colorado
as 1:2022cv02112
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights and James Michael Jones
Defendant:
City of Boulder, Colorado
Interested Party:
Town of Superior, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. James Jones, Jr.
as 22-6912
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EMORY JONES, JR., a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Kirk
JONES et al v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. JONES and KIMBERLY D. GRAY-JONES
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
JONES v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2022cv00245
Petitioner:
JAMES DEAN JONES
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trost v. Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners et al
as 3:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost and Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners, Steve Sisolak, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
James Darren Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Kent International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
