Cases 41 - 50 of 206
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04756
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter v. Pritzer et al
as 4:2020cv04161
Defendant:
Ajay Jetwani, Gregg Scott, Dr J R Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. McHenry County College
as 1:2020cv04179
Defendant:
McHenry County College
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Birdsong et al
as 5:2020cv00067
Defendant:
Karen Smith, Tianna LeGrand, Steven Birdsong and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio T. Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatfield (ID 90406) v. Bellendir et al
as 5:2020cv03112
Plaintiff:
Desie Chatfield
Defendant:
(fnu) Patzner, Brian J. Bellendir, Karen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv02658
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
KAREN SMITH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv00465
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11154
Defendant:
Erick Brois, New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. and Snow Away
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in
Smith v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02410
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soutullo v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Jason Shelton, Danny A. Drake, Lawrence Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Soutullo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
