Cases 41 - 50 of 1,051
Ortiz v. Judith L. Thomas et al
as 4:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Alvin Ortiz
Defendant:
Judith L. Thomas and William P. Clements Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Beebe et al
as 8:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
Derrel L. Thomas
Defendant:
Matthew Beebe, Dennis Osorio, Douglas Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brendon L. Thomas
Defendant:
Dee Smith and Alabama Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05501
Plaintiff:
Minella L Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thompson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00767
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont de Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tamar Thompson, William Spangler, Randall Lynn Spaustat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thompson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03300
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tamar Thompson, William Spangler, Randall Lynn Spaustat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thomas v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Thomas
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, Sheronda Phillips, Mellissa Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Boncher
as 23-1380
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERENCE L. THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
AMY BONCHER, Warden, FMC Devens
USA v. Marvin Thomas
as 23-5508
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARVIN L. THOMAS
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11929
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
