Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Lasota v. Service Transport Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00844
Plaintiff:
James J. Lasota
Defendant:
Service Transport Group, Inc. and Terry L. Huffman
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Huffman et al v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd. et al
as 2:2008cv03611
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Huffman and Lonard L. Huffman
Defendant:
BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD., REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Foster v. Hardy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Shane Foster
Defendant:
A. J. Hardy, M. E. Brantley, E. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Giarratano v. Harvey et al
as 7:2008cv00361
Plaintiff:
Joe Giarratano
Defendant:
A. Harvey, B. Watson, L. Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Huffman et al v. Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd. et al
as 2:2008cv00283
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Huffman and Lonard L. Huffman
Defendant:
Biomedical Tissue Services, Ltd., Regeneration Technologies, Inc., Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Burchett v. Huffman
as 2:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Donald Cole Burchett
Defendant:
Cheryl L Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Everett et al
as 3:2006cv00849
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Goodman
Defendant:
D. B. Everett, D. Robinson, Gene Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harksen v. Pease
as 05-6015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBB M. HARKSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
T. PEASE, Mailroom Officer, D. A. BRAXTON, S. SHORTRIDGE, Operations Officer and others
Edward L. Huffman, Sr. v. Statesrail, Inc.
as TXE/3:00-CV-00030
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Huffman, Sr.
Defendant:
Statesrail, Inc.
Edward L. Huffman, Sr. v. California Western Railroad, Inc., et al.
as AZ/2:00-CV-00789
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Huffman, Sr.
Defendant:
California Western Railroad, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
