Cases 41 - 50 of 9,644
Lovejoy v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Alex Leroy Lovejoy
Respondent:
Melinda Adams and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Winner, et al.
as 24-1912
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ROSE
Defendant:
CONNIE WINNER, TRISDAN KOHUT, REESE, Dr. and others
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Kelly
as 24-1825
Defendant:
HARLAN LEROY KELLY, JR. and Harlan Kelly
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garrett v. Petroleos de Venezuela et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Leroy A. Garrett
Defendant:
Petroleos de Venezuela and PDV Holding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. United States, et al
as 24-3045
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, City of Washington, District of Columbia, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR. and others
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
(HC) Tate v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
LeRoy Tate, Jr.
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
