Cases 41 - 50 of 1,432
Castillo v. Charles Shin Lin, et al.
as 2:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Jesse Castillo
Claimant:
Atkinson, Watkins & Hoffman, LLP and Patriot Law Firm Corporation
Defendant:
Charles Shin Lin, MD, Razmig Garo Kratlian, MD, Abrill M. Jones, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jones et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03399
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Jones and Susan M. Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Person v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv05926
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person and Anthony Shane Person
Defendant:
Ramona M Jones, Romona M Person, Alannah M Athens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Jones v. William Stange
as 23-3239
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jason M. Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stange
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Andre M. Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. UIA et al
as 2:2023cv12460
Plaintiff:
Shantae M. Jones
Defendant:
UIA, Staff Nexus UIA Case, Susan R. Corbin and others
JONES v. DILLS
as 5:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
TRACY M JONES
Respondent:
ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Missouri Dept. of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Jones
Defendant:
Missouri Dept. of Probation and Parole, Anne Precythe and Libby Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
