Cases 41 - 50 of 2,562
Tong Chen et al v. Malik Mukhametkaliyeva et al
as 8:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tong Chen and Xin Xie
Defendant:
Malik Mukhametkaliyeva, Veronika Mukhametkaliyeva, Saul Ramones and others
Malik Bey v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 24-1667
Plaintiff:
MALIK ABDUL BEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PS) Malik et al v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., et al
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Younas Malik and Nazia Jabeen Iqbal
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Insurance Company of America, AMCO Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ali v. Ramsey County Sheriff Office et al
as 0:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Tamir Malik Ali
Defendant:
Ramsey County Sheriff Office, Kelly Wolford, County of Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Banks v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv02710
Plaintiff:
Malik Banks
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fowble v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Todd Fowble
Defendant:
Prince George's County, Maryland, Prince George's County Police Department, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
