Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Murat v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12563
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Health Corporate Office
Plaintiff:
Marie Rose D Murat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Andrews et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11486
Plaintiff:
Thomas Black, John Mastrogianni, Alecia Huie and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
ROSE et al v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv03624
Defendant:
WATERS, MILLER, HECTOR CHULIO and others
Plaintiff:
MARY ROSE and CODY ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez et al v. Village of Bolingbrook et al
as 1:2018cv07503
Defendant:
Officer Lustik, Officer Gruben, Joseph Poradyla and others
Plaintiff:
Mahrokh Afridi and Ernesto Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv00530
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Rose
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alvarez v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04747
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Eliots Chavez Duarte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santana v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04490
Plaintiff:
Luis Perez Santana
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldenegro v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04322
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Baldenegro
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
