Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01216
Plaintiff:
Ernest Jones , Helena Orphey , John Orphey and others
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation, American International Specialty Lines, Insurance Company of the State of PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2012cv01678
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PUGH et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01165
Plaintiff:
JETHRO PUGH, JR. , ROGER BROWN , KAY BROWN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUGH et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-01165
Plaintiff:
JETHRO PUGH, JR. , ROGER BROWN , KAY BROWN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1-100
Baranowski v. Millis Transfer Inc et al
as 7:2011cv04340
Plaintiff:
Kim Baranowski
Defendant:
Millis Transfer Inc and Gary Mitchell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell Johnson v. Gregory Knowlin
as 11-7062
Petitioner - Appellant:
MITCHELL JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden
Johnson v. Knowlin
as 6:2010cv01772
Petitioner:
Mitchell Johnson
Respondent:
Gregory Knowlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOX, et al v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, et al
as 1:2010cv00229
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM THOMAS FOX and SCOTT EVERETT SANDERS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, TIMOTHY R. BELLAMY, GARY W. HASTINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00742
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
