Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Perkins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv05542
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Perkins and Michael Perkins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
U.S. Bank National Association v. Perkins Delaware, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00214
Defendant:
Michael Perkins and Perkins Delaware, LLC
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alvarez et al v. General Electric Company
as 1:2014cv03134
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO ALVAREZ, Lance Bergmann, Fernandez S Austin and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Tinoco et al v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company
as 1:2014cv01456
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tinoco , Bruce Todd , Byron Young and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alvarez et al v. General Electric Company
as 0:2013cv62333
Plaintiff:
Rolando Alvarez , Lance Bergmann , Fernandez S Austin and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Michael Perkins v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 13-16796
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PERKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden and BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
PAYNE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv01260
Defendant:
R. HAMILTON and OHAYYAN
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN RENEA PAYNE , ANTHONY PAYNE and MICHAEL PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perkins v. Swarthout, et al.,
as 2:2013cv00931
Petitioner:
Michael Perkins
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
