Cases 41 - 50 of 39,108
BETHEA v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02580
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BETHEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Maxey v. Sivels et al
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Defendant:
Chap Sivels, Carpenter, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Zurlo
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN DEES and ETHAN DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
JILLIAN KNOX, SAMUAL MAXWELL, EMILY WILLIAMS and others
Richardson v. Wangerin et al
as 5:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Tisha Michelle Conard Richardson
Defendant:
Shawn Wangerin and Ryan Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrade et al v. Vicolina Restaurant Venture LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04477
Plaintiff:
Flor Maria Peralta Andrade and Carlos Alberto Aquino Pineda
Defendant:
Vicolina Restaurant Venture LLC, Kafi Inc., Hiramasa Restaurant Venture LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Neumann v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Michelle Neumann
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and John Doe's #1 and #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. The City of Las Vegas et al
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Stacey Bernard Martin
Defendant:
The City of Las Vegas, Judge Linda Marquis, Dalia Marina-Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faulk v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv05060
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hughes Faulk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
