Cases 41 - 50 of 1,135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nava v. GEICO Secure Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Jaylene Nava
Defendant:
GEICO Secure Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
USA v. Dominguez
as 23-50814
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Fernando Nava Dominguez
CARMONA v. MORENO
as 1:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
MARCOS GRANADOS CARMONA
Defendant:
NATHALIE AYARY NAVA MORENO
Hernandez et al v. Villa Building Group, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03011
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HERNANDEZ, RAFAEL ALEXANDER AREVALO, ORLANDO BERRIOS TENORIO and others
Defendant:
VILLA BUILDING GROUP, LLC, GULZAR, INC., GULZAR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ruiz v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv02262
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luis Felipe Cruz Lopez, Gabriela Oceguera, Hector Salomon Galindo Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAVAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27800
Plaintiff:
BRYAN NAVAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nava v. Sugawa Industry Co. Ltd. et al
as 5:2023cv00277
Executor:
Susie Nava
Defendant:
Sugawa Industry Co. Ltd., Misumi USA, Inc., Yamamoto Press Seisakusho Co. Ltd. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
USA v. Nava
as 23-30675
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Josue Nava
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
