Cases 41 - 50 of 6,789
Alejandro Nunez et al v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv06414
Plaintiff:
Mozhgan Samiei, Jesus Perez, Cecilia Valenzuela and others
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation and First Element, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Antitrust Litigation
Perkins v. The Alcove Troy et al
as 2:2024cv11974
Defendant:
Cailee Christie, The Alcove Troy, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Perkins
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
PERKINS v. USA
as 1:2024cv02287
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL STEVEN PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv05090
Defendant:
D. Niles, Sgt. Gonzales, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Perkins Jefferson, et al.
as 2:2024cv01376
Defendant:
Teddy Miro, Frank Lopez, Jessica Perkins Jefferson and others
Plaintiff:
Seanah Dixon and Toney A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Nursing et al
as 9:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sanchez
Respondent:
Nursing, The Guard of the Coffield Unit, Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Nursing et al
as 6:2024cv00275
Respondent:
Nursing, Capella, The Guard of the Coffield Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Perkins, Sr. v. John Yakomatos, et al
as 24-5665
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM WELCH, DR. JOHN YAKOMATOS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM PERKINS, SR.
Perkins v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01825
Defendant:
Holly Fox, Miguel Fierro-Rendon, Matthew Riggs and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Everett Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
