Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Peter Winegarner v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc., et al
as 11-40024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER DAVID WINEGARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LEWISVILLE TEXAS, CITY OF LEWISVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RYAN MALY, Lewisville TX Police Department Detective and others
Young v. People of the State of New York
as 2:2011cv00110
Defendant:
People of the State of New York
Plaintiff:
Peter David Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peter David Rojas v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2010cv07673
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Peter David Rojas
Winegarner v. Cinemark Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
Peter David Winegarner
Defendant:
Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark Movies 8 of Lewisville, TX, Sarah Van Zandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Kadien et al
as 6:2009cv06639
Plaintiff:
Peter David Young
Defendant:
Gregory T Kadien, Taylor, Glen Goord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter McBean v. Roddie Rushing
as 09-4487
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER DAVID MCBEAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RODDIE RUSHING
CRUZ-HERNANDEZ v. MAYNARD
as 2:2009cv04500
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRUZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
PETER DAVID MAYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBean v. Rushing
as 4:2009cv01492
Petitioner:
Peter David McBean
Respondent:
Roddy Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winegarner v. Cinemark USA, Movie Theaters, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02232
Plaintiff:
Peter David Winegarner
Defendant:
Cinemark USA, Movie Theaters, Inc., Cinemark, Sarah Van Zandt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Webb v. Greenspun
as 1:2008cv01128
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
Peter David Greenspun
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
