Cases 41 - 50 of 230
SGL No. 1 Limited v. Pillai et al
as 1:2021cv04273
Plaintiff:
SGL NO. 1 LIMITED, One of the capital providers for Lloyd's of London Syndicate 609, the sole Lloyd's Syndicate Subscribing to Lloyd's Policy No. ATR/LR/325867 and SGL No. 1 Limited
Defendant:
KHALIL PILLAI and OZZIE QUADRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pillai v. Asta CRS, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00596
Defendant:
ASTA CRS, INC, IQLOGG, INC, Asta CRS, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anoop Pillai
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NASCA v. RUDOWICZ et al
as 3:2021cv00070
Defendant:
JULIE COGNAC, JANE DOES, RICK RUDOWICZ and others
Plaintiff:
DERIAN NASCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Pillai et al
as 3:2021cv00623
Plaintiff:
Adam Taylor
Defendant:
Jeffrey Moody, Abhilash Pillai and Christopher Reeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shand v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00523
Defendant:
Syed Johar Nagvi, Ruiz, Doran and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-1952
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Sharrock v. US
as 21-1889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIL S. KO, XUECHEN ZHANG, HYUNIL JO LEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Nasca v. Rudowicz et al
as 2:2021cv01004
Defendant:
Julie Cognac, Rick Rudowicz, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Derian Nasca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Sohi v. Preitauer et al
as 1:2020cv00639
Plaintiff:
Parneet Sohi Singh
Defendant:
Dan McCable, Steve Pollock, Erhardt Preitauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PILLAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15588
Plaintiff:
AARON PILLAY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
