Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yellowbear v. Hargett et al
as 2:2015cv00213
Plaintiff:
Andrew Yellowbear, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Hargett, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden, Heather Prindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Prindle et al
as 2:2015cv04535
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Gloria Prindle and Nash Oil Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prindle v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv13769
Plaintiff:
Marina Prindle
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlos Lopez Hernandez v. Ed Prindle, et al
as 15-5390
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS ALBERTO LOPEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ED PRINDLE, Jailer, Boone County Jail, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, SYLVIA BONACCORSI-MANO, Chicago Assistant Field Office Director Detention and Removal Operations and others
Lopez-Hernandez v. Prindle et al
as 2:2015cv00010
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Lopez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Ed Prindle, Eric Holder, Sylvia Bonaccorsi-Mano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romero v. Prindle Hill Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01835
Plaintiff:
Luis Romero
Defendant:
Prindle Hill Construction, LLC and Franklin C. Bradley, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lowe v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 2:2014cv00178
Petitioner:
Kurt J. Lowe
Respondent:
Edward Prindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
