Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Braz et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01661
Plaintiff:
Jose Braz , Mary Griffey , Bonnie Lightsey and others
Petitioner:
Vincent Williams
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Leonard et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01792
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Leonard and Margaret Cox
Patterson #283912 v. Unknown McKenna
as 1:2012cv01062
Plaintiff:
Robert Leonard Patterson #283912
Defendant:
Unknown McKenna, Unknown Holmes, Unknown Filsinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Leonard v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2012cv04604
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Doe Deputies of the Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Leonard
Solis v. Kelly Greens Investment Co. Inc., et al
as 4:2012cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Kelly Greens Investment Co. Inc. , McMenamy's, LLC , Richard Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chunn v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv00294
Petitioner:
Robert Leonard Chunn
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coombs v. USA
as 7:2011cv00011
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Leonard Coombs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robert Patterson v. Blaine Lafler
as 10-2408
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEONARD PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
BLAINE C. LAFLER, Warden
Leonard v. Motorsports of Orlando, LLC
as 6:2010cv00970
Plaintiff:
Robert Leonard
Defendant:
Motorsports of Orlando, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Patterson #283912 v. Lafler
as 1:2010cv00375
Petitioner:
Robert Leonard Patterson #283912
Respondent:
Blaine C. Lafler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
