Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Starr v. Price
as 5:2020cv02243
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Starr
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32458
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORNETT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv02112
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE CORNETT
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURHAM v. VANEEKHOVEN et al
as 1:2020cv00066
Defendant:
ROXANN L. VANEEKHOVEN and CABARRUS CO. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LEE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redle v. Uttecht
as 3:2019cv05962
Respondent:
Jeffrey Uttecht and Jeffrey A Uttecht
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Redle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baxin v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01237
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Baxin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holland v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00701
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Motes, as Administrator of Estate of Shannon Lee Sparks v. Wilson et al
as 2:2019cv03057
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Motes, as Administrator of Estate of Shannon Lee Sparks
Defendant:
Alazar Hailemichael, Josi Trucking, LLC, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baxin v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01097
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Baxin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mickelsen et al v. Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services
as 4:2018cv00072
Defendant:
Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services
Plaintiff:
Jyll Scott, Shannon Lee Mendonca, Amy V. Bellum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
