Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Hall v. Smoak et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2020cv01052
Defendant:
Lt. Down, Jason Smoak, James Brazier and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hill and Jonathan Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyle Bosarge v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer Serv, et al
as 20-14298
Defendant / Appellee:
MOBILE AREA WATER & SEWER SERVICE, FATIMA WASHINGTON and SHARON KING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE BOSARGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
King v. Sanofi US Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01669
Plaintiff:
Sharon King
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv08956
Plaintiff:
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust and Calvin Klein, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zheng ru ping, zhang ming and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Austin et al v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joe Austin and Michelle Wilson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, William H. Ruby, DO, Mina Ko, LPN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
White v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
White and Kenneth A. White
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Greg D Carmichael and Sharon King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC
as 1:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
Sharon King
Defendant:
The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
