Cases 41 - 50 of 357
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanfield v. Romanello
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Corinne E Stanfield
Defendant:
Joseph Michael Romanello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Stanfield v. Geico Casualty Company et al
as 1:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanfield
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company and Geico Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Stanfield v. Clement
as 4:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Katherine Lea Stanfield
Respondent:
Warden Janell Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanfield Corporation v. Blackboard Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv01664
Plaintiff:
Stanfield Corporation a/k/a Stanfield Inc, d/b/a Stanfield's Steakhouse
Defendant:
Blackboard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker et al v. The Procter and Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00734
Plaintiff:
Tyler Baker and Brian Stanfield
Defendant:
The Procter and Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEVENSON v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2021cv18970
Plaintiff:
MARLIN STEVENSON
Defendant:
CARL JACKSON, AUGUSTINO and MR. STANFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Berry, Dana Berry, Emily Culver and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Jeremy Stanfield v. Tawkify, Inc.
as 21-16570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY STANFIELD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
TAWKIFY, INC.
Stanfield v. Lasalle Corrections West LLC
as 2:2021cv01535
Plaintiff:
Edith Stanfield
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections West LCC and Lasalle Corrections West LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
