Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Steinert v. Dematteo et al
as 1:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Steinert
Defendant:
Robert Dematteo, James Bridgeford, Parham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steinert v. Colvin
as 6:2013cv03479
Plaintiff:
Bonnie S Steinert
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Steinert v. Barlow et al
as 4:2013cv00597
Plaintiff:
Westley Steinert
Defendant:
Jamie Barlow and Ron Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington, Reo v. Steinert et al
as 3:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
Reo L. Covington
Defendant:
Steinert , Marie Svec , Paul Ludvigson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Favors v. Hoover et al
as 0:2013cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant:
Michelle Hoover, Cal Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson and others
Favors v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv00108
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Respondent:
Lucinda Jesson , Joan Fabian , Cal Ludeman and others
Alexander et al v. TIN, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02815
Plaintiff:
Lena Alexander , Milton Andrews, Jr. , Betty Bishop and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc. and International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Norton v. Ludeman et al
as 0:2012cv00440
Plaintiff:
Russell Norton
Defendant:
Cal R. Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEINERT et al v. MERCK, SHARPE & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
JULIE STEINERT and STEPHEN MICHAEL STEINERT
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARPE & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Krych v. DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants et al
as 0:2011cv03091
Plaintiff:
Chris Krych
Defendant:
DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants, Kent Johansen, Barbara Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
