Cases 41 - 50 of 155
Ashley Abramson v. Equifax Inc.
as CAC/8:17-cv-02201
Plaintiff:
Ashley Abramson , Kimberly Dawn Alvarez , Edwin Jeffrey Amador and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Ashley Abramson v. Equifax Inc.
as 8:2017cv02201
Plaintiff:
Ashley Abramson, Kimberly Dawn Alvarez, Edwin Jeffrey Amador and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
STUDER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03825
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ANDRE STUDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gully, Jr. et al v. Fitza et al
as 1:2017cv03355
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gully, Jr.
Defendant:
Fitza, Nicholas Lamb, Michael Studer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Tucker
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Don Verrett, Nikki Studer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deering v. Studer et al
as 1:2017cv02360
Plaintiff:
Lavelle Deering
Defendant:
Michael Studer, Quinten Tanner, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Bartter et al
as 5:2017cv00239
Defendant:
Bartter, Dominion Resources, Inc., NiSource Corporate Services Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Studer v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv02353
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Studer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
