Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Gregory Smith v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden of S.V.S.P., R. MACHUCA, Jr., Correctional Sergeant at S.V.S.P. and others
Stehman v. Elite Consumer Services, LLC et al
as 6:2017cv00731
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Stehman
Defendant:
Elite Consumer Services, LLC and Andrew Trexler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Earl Warner v. Y. Friedman, et al
as 17-15246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
Y. FRIEDMAN, Rabbi; Ortodox Jewish Chaplin, A. SOLIS, Correctional Administrator, K. KOSTECKY, Administrator Third and Final Level Review Appeals and others
Warner v. Friedman et al
as 4:2016cv04345
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
Rabbi Y. Friedman, A. Solis, K. Kostecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trexler et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
Beverly Trexler and James Trexler
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tunstall-Bey v. Smith et al
as 5:2015ct03334
Plaintiff:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey
Defendant:
Paula Yvonne Smith, Carmen Hendricks, Letitia Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENCKINI v. COOPERSBURG BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2015cv06017
Plaintiff:
GENE C. BENCKINI
Defendant:
COOPERSBURG BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DANIEL C. TREXLER, WILLIAM NAHRGANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMOYER v. HOME PROPERTIES TREXLER, LLC
as 5:2015cv01514
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SCHMOYER
Defendant:
HOME PROPERTIES TREXLER PARK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TREXLER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (SSA)
as 1:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
ALAN BRADLEY TREXLER
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
