Cases 41 - 50 of 378
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant:
Martha Doenning
Appellant:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
Torkelsen v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America et al v. MPLX, LP
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of North Dakota and State of Wyoming
Defendant:
MPLX, LP
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GenBioPro, Inc. v. Sorsaia et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
GenBioPro, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark A. Sorsaia, Patrick Morrissey and Patrick Morrisey
Amicus Curiae:
The State of Alabama, The State of Arkansas, The State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Access Independent Health Services, Inc., et al v. Birch Burdick, et al
as 22-3595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MKB Management Corp., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic, Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D. and Access Independent Health Services, Inc., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic
Defendant:
Birch Burdick, in his official capacity as State Attorney for Cass County, Larry Johnson, M.D. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners, Robert Tanous, D.O. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Drew Howard Wrigley, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, et al.
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 22-30748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health & Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Brown v. EDUC
as 22-11115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Education and Miguel Cardona, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Education
Amicus Curiae:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, State of Utah and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
