Cases 41 - 50 of 869
REAVES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 3:2020cv00166
Petitioner:
Harold Reaves
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (C.S.C.O.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valesquez v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2020cv00583
Petitioner:
Jose Valesquez
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HUNTER v. JAMISON et al
as 1:2019cv03463
Defendant:
CLARENCE THOMAS, U.S. SENATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATURE and SEVEN JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff:
DARRYL M. MCGUIRE
Respondent:
J.L JAMISON and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
NATHAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fourstar et al v Trump et al
as 2:2019cv01899
Defendant:
Unknown Officials of Designation and Sentence Computation Center (Grand Prairie, Texas), Connie Tonini, Israel Jacquez and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Bruce John Denny, David Allen McQueen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Smallwood v. Warden Butner FCC, et al
as 19-3514
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BUTNER FCC and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EUGENE SMALLWOOD
Hurt v. US, et al
as 19-2078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, DC PAROLE BOARD and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Raymond Gill v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 19-7512
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE COAKLEY, Warden and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Barnes v The United States Parole Commission
as 1:2019cv12052
Respondent:
The United States Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Eric Derell Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jesse Redmond, Jr. v. USPC
as 19-5239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesse R. Redmond, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Parole Commission
Webb-El v. United States Parole
as 19-1326
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH BRYAN WEBB-EL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
