Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Shoemake v. Baird et al
as 1:2017cv04428
Plaintiff:
Andjonne Shoemake
Defendant:
Sheriff Baird, Sheriff (name unknown) 1 and Sheriff (name unknown) 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landery v. Saucedo et al
as 1:2017cv04400
Plaintiff:
Ivan Landery
Defendant:
Sheriff Saucedo, Sheriff (name unknown) 1 and Sheriff (name unknown) 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 17-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY C. HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISCH, SEAN FOSTER and others
Liudmila Muraveva, et al v. Shawn Toffoli, et al
as 16-4318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIUDMILA MURAVEVA
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLAYTON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAWN A. TOFFOLI, JAMES STEVENS, WILDWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Brian Snoke, et al v. Secratary of United States, et al
as 16-56517
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN LAWRENCE SNOKE, BRIAN RAWRENCE RACISTS RADIO ROOM REGISTEREES and UNKNOWN, 1-100
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRATARY OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE and FOIA 2015-11-756 PUBLIC INFORMATION
Khaaliq Binns v. D. Asuncion et al
as 2:2016cv05481
Defendant:
D. Asuncion, D. Asuncion, Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Khaaliq Binns
WILLIAMS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Defendant:
V. RIGSBY, KATHERINE SIEREVELD, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SURTI et al v. CRAIG et al
as 1:2015cv03949
Plaintiff:
ROHIT B. SURTI and JAYSHRI R. SURTI
Defendant:
KEVIN CRAIG , LAURA WINKEL , CITY OF ABSECON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigue v. Davis et al
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Vigue
Defendant:
Keith Davis, R. Langford, Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Martin
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc., John Harler, Dayna Vango and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
