Cases 41 - 50 of 724
Dandridge v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00647
Petitioner:
Victor M. Dandridge, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Casillas v. DVA
as 22-2264
Petitioner:
VICTOR M. CASILLAS
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Casillas v. DVA
as 22-2265
Petitioner:
VICTOR M. CASILLAS
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
URBAEZ et al v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NJ et al
as 2:2022cv05585
Plaintiff:
VICTOR J. URBAEZ, VICTOR M. URBAEZ and JENNESE TORRES
Defendant:
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NJ, THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARROQUIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09705
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M MARROQUIN and DIANA MARROQUIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
De Santiago v. USA
as 3:2022cv05050
Petitioner:
Victor M. De Santiago
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dandridge v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00249
Petitioner:
Victor M. Dandridge, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
