Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Owens, Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01970
Plaintiff:
William Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Overbaugh et al
as 9:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Michael Overbaugh, Raymond Catina, Vincent Cuda, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26478
Plaintiff:
Linda Owens and William Owens
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens v. Commissioner of SSA
as 5:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
William Owens, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Clayton v. Forrester et al
as 3:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Chip Forrester, Brandon Puttbrese, Sean Braisted and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owen et al v. Grant County Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Lonzie Maggard Owen and William Owen
Defendant:
Grant County Detention Center , Grant County Fiscal Court , Terry Peoples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2011md02308
Plaintiff:
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation, Melissa Kearnely, Richard Kearnely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Spivey v. Phoenix et al
as 3:2013cv00693
Petitioner:
William Owen Spivey, II
Respondent:
Richard Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spivey v. Hudson et al
as 3:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
William Owen Spivey
Defendant:
M. Hudson, L Phelps, W Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey II v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
William Owen Spivey II
Defendant:
C.O. Smith and C.O. Lindenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
