Cases 41 - 50 of 3,635
United States of America v. Delgado et al
as 1:2024mc50151
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ricardo Delgado, II, Gregory Martin Hayes, Austin Antonio Saucedo and others
Petitioner:
Devica Thompson-Pratt
Shannon v. Hale et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Shecorey D. Shannon
Defendant:
Michael J. Hale and Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
B Wright, C Allen and Wesley Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graff v. Erdner Bros, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
RONDA L GRAFF and Ronda L. Graff
Defendant:
ERDNER BROS, INC, Erdner Bros, Inc. and Anthony Dunn-Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Townsend v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Paula Townsend
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Townsend v. Mason, et al.
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
A. Walker and Wesley Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Angela Richardson v. Susan Townsend, et al
as 24-1059
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Susan Townsend, Investigator, Internal Affair Division, Pine Bluff Central Office and Anthony Jackson, Deputy Warden, Pine Bluff Central Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Townsend #257689 v. Morrison
as 1:2023cv01371
Petitioner:
Jason Lanelle Townsend #257689
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
