Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Oliver v. Hines et al
as 1:2012cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jane Williams Oliver
Defendant:
Charleyrene Danforth Hines , Patricia D'Rene Dan Lethgo , Mary Kate Williams Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jefferson v. USA
as 5:2012cv00483
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Oliver Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Heard v. Georgia Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Georgia Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Burriss
as 1:2012mc00239
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
William Oliver Burriss, Jr.
Malmstrom v. Malmstrom et al
as 0:2012cv00368
Plaintiff:
Judith E. Malmstrom
Defendant:
Terra Ann Malmstrom and William Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Sizemore v. R. Ground
as 11-15419
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM OLIVER SIZEMORE
Respondent - Appellee:
R. GROUNDS
Oliver v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2010cv01281
Plaintiff:
Troy William Oliver
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility, Misty Taylor and Bill Winchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Taylor et al
as 1:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Bart Burton
Defendant:
Josh Taylor, William Oliver, Tracy Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Rutherford et al
as 4:2010cv00893
Defendant:
Frank Rutherford , Youngstown Police Department , Jimmy F. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
William Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER et al v. A.P. SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88120
Plaintiff:
DORIS OLIVER and WILLIAM OLIVER
Defendant:
A.P. SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
