Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Mandujano Andrade, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-3305
Petitioner:
LUCIA MANDUJANO ANDRADE and GILBERTO CARRILLO ZAMUDIO
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GLASSBURN et al v. WELCH et al
as 1:2026cv23616
Plaintiff:
NICK GLASSBURN, NS BURNER LLC and NIL MANAGEMENT VENTURES, LLC
Defendant:
VERONICA WELCH, KEVIN ANDRADE and FENIX MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. Fujiwara, et al.
as 26-3270
Plaintiff:
LARRY SMITH
Defendant:
N. FUJIWARA, Sergeant, N. ROMNEY, Correctional Officer, RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Andrade et al v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2026cv01872
Plaintiff:
Sophia Andrade and Alejandro Carrasco
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Andrade v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2026cv12191
Plaintiff:
Nelson Andrade
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Washington v. Villanueva, et al.
as 26-3039
Plaintiff:
RODERICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ALEX VILLANUEVA, MOTLEY, JACKSON and others
Andrade-Figueroa v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv12179
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Andrade-Figueroa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00456
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
